Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Post #3








This weekend was a blur. If you've ready or heard anything else about my weekend, it's not true.

I’m still concused and confused and as none of the weekends wines were spectacular I’ll try and keep this brief. Let’s start with some sparkling. Friends in the industry often give Chandon (www.greenpoint.com.au) a bit of a kicking and based on the Domain Chandon Brut 2004, I can understand why. It’s hard to get enthused by a Kraken of the Champagne industry oozing its oily tentacles into both California and the Yarra Valley, and who assume various disguises depending upon the market. World domination my mediocrity is only a credit card swipe away.

The Vintage Brut is a single vintage made in the traditional method and had some green and citrus fruit, along with some classic yeast and bready characters. The balance and structure were OK, but like a children’s party, it had a bit too much sugar than what was good for it and overall it was bit lumbering and unrefined. Not bad, and you wouldn’t mind if you drank it at a party, but at $24 there are better options. I will persevere and try the well regarded Chandon ZD (zero dosage) when I get a chance.

I’ve read a lot of good stuff about the Charles Sturt University (http://www.csu.edu.au/winery/cellar-range.htm) Orange Chardonnay, and Halliday included the 07 vintage in his 100 top Australian wines. Even so, I felt a slight reticence when I handed over (an admittedly measly) $12 for the Charles Sturt University 2004 Cabernet Merlot, and I should have trusted my gut feeling rather than dismiss it as the result of bad sushi. There was plenty of varietal black fruit that hadn’t diminished from the time in the bottle, but it exploded in the mid palate with not much else to support it. The high acidity was an elbow sticking in your ribs on a crowded train and there’s probably more length in an Italian Government. I don’t want to be unkind, but it’s back to school for this one. I’m sorry. I won’t let that happen again.

In the words of Vanessa Williams, I go and save the best till last. Innocent Bystander (http://www.innocentbystander.com.au/) are the second label to Giant Steps, who I seem to know a fair bit about but who’s wines I’ve somehow managed to avoid. My first foray into the world of Phil Sexton and Steve Flamstead, who have been nominated for the Gourmet Wine Traveller Winemaker of the year award, is the Innocent Bystander Bleeding Heart Sangiovese Merlot 2006. Once you get past the name there’s a really nice spicy red, with red and black fruit on the nose, earthy cherries and plums on the palate, and is savoury with a good acidity and firm tannin structure. Not perfect, but I liked it as it’s a bit raw and rustic and not uber friendly. It opened up nicely after some time in the decanter and went well with a bowl of spaghetti and tomato sauce. The website is worth having a look at and is as interesting as the wine.

Sunday saw my first father’s day and my first father’s day gift. I don’t know much about Sarsfield Estate (http://www.sarsfieldestate.com.au), but their Pinot is highly regarded and I look forward to tasting the 2005 Gippsland Pinot Noir that my son kindly gave me, hopefully sooner rather than later.

That’s it, I’ll be back soon with a couple of Bargain Bin specials

Be seeing you.

4 comments:

jeremy said...

Hi Rawshack
Back from my holidays to see you've been hard at work in the world of children and wine :)
God Jeni and Phillip turned it on for us during our CF visit. Some incredibly tasty cheeses and cured meats followed by a lunch of Osso Bucco with a 2000 CF pinot in the main dining hall. Damn good and ridiculously generous.
Interesting thoughts on the 2004 Chandon. It is (too) sweet, but at its price I seem to end up drinking a fair bit of it (good ol' Halliday likes it too?). What are your other suggestions for a vintage (or NV) brut around this price? Oh, and the ZDs are awesome-o, try the 2004 Blanc de Blancs ZD and if you don't enjoy it, I will eat my shoe...well, no I won't, but it sounded good.
On Sarsfield, a learned pinotphile whose judgements I trust was very impressed with it, so please let us know what you think. The maker was also very informative at a pinot Masterclass from which said learned friend kindly bought home well taken notes.
Okay enough from me for now. I'm sick as a dog actually but found if I just kept imbibing at cellar doors, my nose stayed lively and my palate perservered. Then when I stopped and caught the flight home I felt all sorts of unholy feverish pain as my economy flight circled Brisbane airport waiting for healthy people in business and first class to land! Grrrr...
Trust you are well. Cheers jeremy

Rawshack said...

Welcome back Jeremy!

Glad you had a good visit at Curly Flat; I'm inspired to make my trip sooner rather than later

The first impressions of the Chandon were good; it was lively with some complexity. Only when the fizz went and you got down to the base wine did I realise that it was a bit flawed. I'll try the ZD this weekend if I get a chance.

The Sarsfield might also make an appearance soon as well - I've had a bit of an epiphany with pinot recently, so expect a few more pinot reviews

Hope you're feeling chipper soon old boy!

jeremy said...

Am slowly feeling better thanks. And I do understand your view on Chandon. The dosage is misjudged in my opinion and I like better sparklies. Its just cheap is all.

Rawshack said...

You're right about it being a decent enough wine for the price (Dan Murphy's has it just above the $20 mark) but I think that maybe something like the Yarra Burn is a better option...

Will give the ZD a go this weekend and see how I get on